The actual cross-sectional profile of the ribs on the ground floor is essentially that of a vertical rectangle with beveled corners , Fig. 2 and 4. Schirmer indicates that the depth of the ribs cross-sectional rectangle is 0.50 m for the diagonal ribs and 0.52 m for the transverse ribs on the ground floor (Abb. 27, pg. 39), Fig. 14. Schirmer also indicates that the capital and base of the columns have a semi-octagonal form extending 1.024 m from side-to-side against the wall (Abb. 20, pg. 27), Fig. 15. As delineated above, the lateral extension of the column capital matches the length of two transverse ribs side by side. These measures point therefore to a common design measure for the cross-sectional depth of the ribs, which is 0.51 m for both diagonal and transverse ribs. The ribs on the upper floor, which have a larger curvature radius, have likely similar dimensions for the rectangular frame of their cross-section.
[The diagonal ribs on the upper floor have an ornate circular face on the bottom portion of the rectangular cross-sectional frame.]
Missing for this analysis is a measure for the width of the rib cross-sectional rectangle. It is clear from a visual observation that the diagonal ribs have a smaller cross-sectional width than the transverse ribs, Fig. 3, 4 and 5. A measure for the missing data on the width of the ribs is theorized based on a geometric model with a tie to the established depth of the rib, and consistent with visual observation on the width of these ribs.
The form of the tas-de-charge footprint is constructed by overlapping rib cross-sectional rectangles, Fig. 16. Half the measure of the lateral width of the column capital, 0.51 m, is assigned to the depth of the ribs, which is the length of the rib rectangular frame, as indicated above. It is posited that the width of the transverse rib rectangle might be the width of the full side of the semi-octagonal perimeter of the column capital, which is 0.43 m. The two transverse rib rectangles at right angle to each other overlap close to the geometric merging center, Fig. 16.
The overlapping area is a square with a measure of the side that is half the width of the transverse rib rectangle. It can be shown from geometry that the diagonal of this square has the measure of the sides of the equilateral triangles (sides ”a” of triangle “T” in Fig. 16) formed at the corners of a square that circumscribes an octagon and shares four of its sides. This is the octagon-squared figure that has been identified as the model that the medieval designers used to define the measure of the semi-octagon for the column base and capital and involve the Castel-del-Monte foot used as a unit of measurement. The diagonal of this overlapping square has therefore the measure of exactly one CdM-foot, 0.302 m (the measure “a” of the equilateral triangle “T”).
The diagonal rib rectangle has the same depth as the transverse rib, 0.51 m, spanning from the geometric merging center of the rib arcs to the side of the capital semi-octagon, along the line bisecting the 90° angle between the transverse ribs. The width of the diagonal rib rectangle can be set geometrically as the diagonal of the square formed by the overlapping transverse ribs, Fig. 16. The width of the diagonal rib rectangle would then be exactly one CdM-foot, 0.302 m. This makes the width of the diagonal rib 70% the width of the transverse rib. This difference contributes to the separation of the ribs in the form of a notch, which starts at the footprint of the tas-de-charge. Based on the posited measures for the width of the rib rectangles, this notch between the transverse and diagonal ribs is deep 6.5 cm at the footprint of the tas-de-charge .
[The notch depth of 6.5 cm is measured from the corner of the diagonal rib rectangle; the actual ribs have beveled corners.]
Such choices for the width measures for the rib cross-sectional rectangular frames are very plausible. They are consistent with visual observation and are grounded on geometry involving the linear unit of measurement at Castel del Monte. This follows the geometric theme in the design at Castel del Monte, and was likely the only “scientific” and rational basis that the medieval architects had to guide their creative planning.
|